Executive Summary
CUES encourages employees, members, contractors, and partners to raise concerns when an AI-enabled system or AI-assisted workflow may have caused an unfair or harmful result. This page provides a standard way to document concerns so they can be reviewed consistently, routed to the right stakeholders, and tracked through resolution.
When to Report
Bias or unfairness
Report outcomes that appear discriminatory, uneven, exclusionary, or inconsistent across people, groups, or member segments.
Accuracy or harm
Report hallucinations, incorrect summaries, missing context, harmful recommendations, or automation errors that affected work or decisions.
Privacy or access
Report issues involving sensitive data exposure, unauthorized recording, retention concerns, broken permissions, or inaccessible outputs.
- AI-generated meeting notes omitted a key decision or assigned actions to the wrong person.
- An AI workflow produced content or recommendations that may disadvantage a person or group.
- A recording, transcript, or summary was stored in the wrong place or shared too broadly.
- An automated process used data in a way that seems inconsistent with policy or expected consent.
Adverse Impact Reporting Form
This page is a formatted reporting template. Submission workflow can later be connected to SharePoint, Microsoft Forms, Power Automate, or another approved CUES intake process.
Review Process
- Intake: Capture the concern, affected system, and impact details using the standard form.
- Triage: Route the report to the appropriate governance, IT, HR, legal, or business owner based on the nature of the issue.
- Assessment: Review available evidence, validate facts, assess risk, and determine whether corrective action is required.
- Follow-up: Document remediation, communications, policy updates, or system changes needed to reduce repeat issues.
- Closure: Track disposition and retain records according to approved governance and retention practices.
FAQ
That depends on the final intake workflow CUES chooses. This prototype includes named fields, but the production version can be adapted to support anonymous or confidential reporting where appropriate.
No. This form is for raising concerns and documenting potential adverse impacts so they can be reviewed fairly and consistently.